Solidarity Statement with CDCJ

Last week, Columbia Divest for Climate Justice received notice that they might face disciplinary action for their protest against BP and were then forced to meet with Columbia's Rules Administrator, Suzanne Goldberg, regarding their actions.

We are disappointed that rather than address the damage caused by Columbia's investments in fossil fuel, Columbia is principally concerned with silencing free speech. In threatening CDCJ members with disciplinary action for violating Columbia's ambiguous Rules of Conduct — rules which Goldberg, who was not democratically elected to her position, has a personal investment in enforcing against student protesters — Columbia is depriving CDCJ members of their right to protest and receive an equal education.

As an organization that understands the importance of direct action and the destruction Columbia's investments inflict upon the planet, particularly against Black people and people of color, we stand in solidarity with CDCJ. We as students have the right and the duty to speak out against the gross inaction of Columbia's admin.

NRT Statement on Columbia Student Council's Inaction

On February 14, No Red Tape presented our SAAFE Campus Demands to the Columbia College Student Council (CCSC). The demands, created in conjunction with over a dozen campus organizations, aim to increase resources for survivors of sexual and dating violence at Columbia, particularly survivors who are members of marginalized communities. We were disappointed to discover that CCSC was unwilling to publicize our demands like we asked.

Rather than support our petition, CCSC offered to present our demands to the administrators for us. However, student activists and survivors have spent hundreds of hours crafting these demands; why shouldn’t we have a seat at the table?

As we have many times before, No Red Tape saw the need for direct action last semester when representatives from the co-sponsors of the SAAFE Campus Demands met with EVP Suzanne Goldberg with the intention of having a productive dialogue. Rather than engage with us, Goldberg avoided making any commitments. The only thing Goldberg would commit to was arranging a meeting with No Red Tape, Black Students’ Organization, and James McShane, Director of Public Safety, at the beginning of the Spring semester to discuss Columbia’s Clery Act flyers. However, we still haven’t heard from Goldberg about this.

Goldberg’s avoidance isn’t an isolated incident, but part of a decades-old pattern of administrators covering up sexual and dating violence on campus. As a student governing body, CCSC could productively help survivors in their struggle for justice by including the SAAFE petition in its weekly email. We refuse to be silenced while survivors continue to experience discrimination and violence, and urge CCSC to reevaluate its priorities.


If you feel like Columbia administrators should commit to making our campus safe, please sign our petition here.

SAAFE Protest Demands

Want to support these demands? Sign our petition!

October 28, 2015

To the Columbia Administration:

Despite the recent update to the Gender-Based Misconduct Policy and the new Sexual Respect Initiative, survivors on this campus continue to feel unsafe, retraumatized and failed by the administrators that are supposed to support them. To ensure this is an inclusive educational environment and everyone can thrive, regardless of identity (including but not limited to race, sex, gender, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status, immigration status, and religion), we demand the following changes:

Support

  • Increase culturally responsive mental health services and trauma response staff by requiring the Safe Zone Training offered by the Office of Multicultural Affairs and trainings addressing other issues of including, but not limited to, race and class.
  • Have professional staffing at a Rape Crisis Center on campus 24/7.
  • Allow students to have both moral and legal support throughout the reporting and adjudication process. Students should not have to choose between having a loved one or lawyer by their side.
  • Remove the exception for GBM that requires the Office of Disability Services, Health Services, and all other normally confidential services to report cases of GBM. Survivors should be able to request accommodations without triggering an investigation.
  • Educate all first-responders to be culturally sensitive and aware of resources on campus, including  immediate support to feel safe navigating campus, STI testing and reporting options.

Accessibility

  • Revise the policy language to remove unnecessarily complex and inaccessible legal jargon. The policy’s language should be clear and easily understood by any student.
  • Provide students, especially those who cannot afford an attorney advisor, with more options for legal representation, such as alumni, members of the campus legal community or other volunteer attorneys.
  • Make aggregate data about processes available to all students, including instances of repeat offenders and specific information about accommodations granted.
  • Revise policy language to clarify procedures for requesting academic and other interim and post accommodations and grant students more agency over academic and other accommodations by:
  • Removing the Student Conduct and Community Standards Office from the decision-making process around academic accommodations, such as exam extensions and course withdrawals.
  • Allowing for increased coordination between the Office of Gender-Based Misconduct, Disability Services and the various CU schools to increase access to accommodations for student survivors. Academic accommodations should be handled by same university offices that handle these issues in other, non-sexual misconduct contexts.

Accountability

  • Allow a wide variety of students to be consistently involved in the revision and oversight of campus policies and programs.  
  • Revise Clery Crime Alert protocols to include information about on-going threats posed by university-affiliated individuals. Additionally, revise language of the alerts to include trigger warnings and replace victim blaming “tips” with resources for survivors.  
  • Explicitly recognize students’ right to record all interviews and meetings with Student Conduct and Community Standards staff to ensure the accuracy of all parties’ accounts and the legitimacy of the overall process.
  • Increase transparency around employee training and qualifications, especially for legally mandated reporters, GBM investigators, and hearing panelists.
  • Establish a feedback mechanism that allows students to share their experiences with Columbia’s prevention programs, resources and adjudication processes. This survey should be widely publicized and received by an independent body that does not control any of the previously mentioned programs, potentially composed of faculty, to avoid further conflict of interest.

Funding

  • Increase the number of investigators and case managers to ensure appropriate responses to conflicts of interest requests. For example, a student should never be reassigned to his or her alleged assailant’s case manager after submitting a conflict of interest request.
  • Make the SVR peer advocate and peer educator jobs paid positions of at least $15/hour to reflect their value in our community and increase accessibility for low-income students.
  • Fund mental and physical health services so survivors don’t have to face weeks of wait times.
  • Institute and publicize regular support groups for survivors of varying kinds of violence.

Enforcement

  • Clarify enforcement mechanisms to ensure the policy works as written.
  • Remove conflict of interest from adjudication by appointing objective administrators or faculty.
  • Include a process for the investigation and removal of investigators, case managers and other employees, who fail to adequately and appropriately carry out their duties on behalf of survivors.
  • Create and require more robust prevention programs with professional oversight to ensure all students participate in a meaningful way.
  • Allow students to file an anonymous report so it can be counted in Clery Crime Statistics without initiating an investigation process.

Sincerely,

No Red Tape, The Black Law Students Association, Empowering Women of Color, GSAS Students of Color Alliance, Take Back the Night, The Latino/a Law Students Association, Columbia Law School’s Domestic Violence Project, Students for Justice in Palestine, International Socialist Organization, Student Worker Solidarity, Jewish Voice for Peace, Columbia Women’s Rugby, Columbia Queer Alliance, Coalition Against Sexual Violence, Columbia Law Feminist Society

Solidarity Statement with Columbia University Apartheid Divest

TW: sexual assault

No Red Tape stands in solidarity with Columbia University Apartheid Divest. As an organization which fights to end rape culture, we recognize that sexual violence is intimately connected with colonialism, imperialism, and other forms of state violence. As shown by the stories of Rasmeah Odeh and countless Palestinian survivors, sexual violence has routinely been used as a tool of oppression against Palestinian women. It is unacceptable that women's bodies continue to be targeted as part of Israel's project of occupation. Because of these connections, our cause is intertwined with the Palestinian people's struggle for liberation. We support Students for Justice in Palestine and Jewish Voice for Peace as they call on Columbia to divest from Israeli Apartheid and affirm the basic rights of Palestinian people.

For more information on Columbia University Apartheid Divest:
Facebook: facebook.com/CUapartheiddivest
Email: cuapartheiddivest@gmail.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/ColumbiaBDS
Website: apartheiddivest.org
Sign their petition: bit.ly/CUADpet

NRT Statement on Anonymous Title IX Related Violations

At the Columbia University Senate Plenary meeting this past November, members of the Senate discussed a proposal to disregard anonymous Title IX-related comments on course evaluations. Under this proposal from the Faculty Affairs Committee (FAC), anonymous reports of sexual harassment, racism, and other forms of violence and discrimination would not be investigated if found in Courseworks evaluations. The University has since released a statement about its commitment to fulfilling its requirements under Title IX. As an anti-sexual violence organization on Columbia’s campus, No Red Tape would like to affirm our belief that all reports of harassment or discrimination in the classroom must be investigated and taken seriously.

At the Plenary meeting, the FAC proposed that Title IX complaints should not be anonymous
and should instead be linked to students’ UNIs. However, given the imbalance of power between professors and students, anonymous reports are often the only way students feel safe coming forward about mistreatment they have experienced in the classroom. It is imperative that students have an anonymous channel through which to voice concerns about their classroom environments.

Ignoring these reports would only perpetuate the silencing of sexual violence survivors and other marginalized students on this campus. In the plenary meeting and in an earlier letter, Senate members were preoccupied with the impact that a Title IX investigation could have on a professor’s career. This is an understandable concern, and we do not believe that professors should be sanctioned without complete and thorough investigations. However, little mention was made of the lasting effects that gender-based misconduct and other forms of violence can have on a student’s academic life and wellbeing. If an investigation uncovers wrongdoing on the part of a professor, we hope that such behavior would be seen as an egregious violation of our shared community ideals. Professors’ careers and reputations should never be prioritized at the expense of student safety.

While we agree that classrooms should be forums for the open exchange of ideas, that does not mean that they are beyond the reach of Title IX. Advocating for professors to be accountable for their actions does not encroach on academic freedom. In fact, it enables us to have academic spaces where the contributions of all members of our community are respected and valued. If harassment and discrimination are allowed in the classroom, it becomes impossible to have the intellectually vigorous academic spaces for which FAC members have passionately advocated.

In the interests of student safety and academic freedom, anonymous reports must be investigated by the university. We will not have productive academic spaces unless both professors and students are held accountable for their behavior. We will not have a campus free of violence until every student can walk into classrooms, office hours, and lecture halls without fear of experiencing discrimination or assault.
 
April 2015 Faculty Affairs Committee Statement on Anonymous Comments in Course Evaluations

Nov 20, 2015 CU Senate Plenary Meeting Minutes